THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCCUPATIONAL STRESS FACTORS AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AMONG NON-ACADEMIC STAFF OF UNIVERSITIES IN KATSINA STATE: MODERATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT

Authors

Keywords:

Occupational Stress Factors; Employee Engagement; Perceived Organisational Support; Non-Academic Staff; Universities

Abstract

Occupational stress remains a significant organizational concern because excessive workload, unfavorable work environments and problematic interpersonal relations may undermine employees’ capacity to remain engaged in their work. This study examined the relationship between occupational stress factors and employee engagement among non-academic staff of universities in Katsina State, with perceived organisational support as a moderating variable. Specifically, the study examined the relationship between occupational stress factors and employee engagement, determined the relationship between perceived organisational support and employee engagement, and assessed whether perceived organisational support moderates the relationship between occupational stress factors and employee engagement. A descriptive, quantitative survey design was adopted. The population comprised 3,251 non-academic staff from Federal University, Dutsin-Ma, Umaru Musa Yar’adua University and Al-Qalam University, Katsina, from which 343 respondents were selected using proportionate allocation and simple random sampling. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered mainly through Google Forms, with paper copies provided where necessary. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and ordinary least-squares regression, with an interaction term used to test moderation at the 5% significance level. The findings showed that occupational stress factors were significantly and negatively associated with employee engagement (B = -.303, β = -.288, p < .001), while perceived organisational support was significantly and positively associated with employee engagement (B = .330, β = .294, p < .001). The interaction between occupational stress factors and perceived organisational support was positive and statistically significant (B = 1.581, β = .299, p < .001), confirming a moderating effect. Simple-slope analysis further showed that the negative relationship between occupational stress factors and employee engagement was significant at low and mean levels of perceived organisational support but became non-significant at high levels of support. The study concludes that perceived organisational support buffers the negative relationship between occupational stress factors and employee engagement. Universities should therefore strengthen workload management, staffing, workplace facilities, supervisory support, fairness, recognition and employee welfare to sustain employee engagement

Dimensions

Amankwah, M. O. (2023). The mediational role of individual and organizational factors in the work engagement and occupational stress relationship. Journal of General Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231172600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231172600

Asghar, M., Tayyab, M., Gull, N., Zhijie, S., Shi, R., & Tao, X. (2021). Polychronicity, work engagement, and turnover intention: The moderating role of perceived organizational support in the hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.09.004

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2024). Job demands–resources theory: Frequently asked questions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 29(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000376

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933

Bolliger, L., Baele, E., Colman, E., Debra, G., Lukan, J., Luštrek, M., De Bacquer, D., & Clays, E. (2023). The association between day-to-day stress experiences, recovery, and work engagement among office workers in academia—An ecological momentary assessment study. PLOS ONE, 18(2), e0281556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281556

Bonaiuto, F., Fantinelli, S., Milani, A., Cortini, M., Vitiello, M. C., & Bonaiuto, M. (2022). Perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of psychosocial variables. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(5), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2021-0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2021-0140

Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., Lako, C. J., & de Vries, M. S. (2020). The attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes of work engagement: A comparative meta-analysis across the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19840399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19840399

Canboy, B., Tillou, C., Barzantny, C., Güçlü, B., & Benichoux, F. (2023). The impact of perceived organizational support on work meaningfulness, engagement, and perceived stress in France. European Management Journal, 41(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.12.004

Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job demands–resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands–Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

du Prel, J.-B., Koscec Bjelajac, A., Franić, Z., Henftling, L., Brborović, H., Schernhammer, E., McElvenny, D. M., Merisalu, E., Pranjic, N., Guseva Canu, I., & Godderis, L. (2024). The relationship between work-related stress and depression: A scoping review. Public Health Reviews, 45, 1606968. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2024.1606968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2024.1606968

Eisenberger, R., Rhoades Shanock, L., & Wen, X. (2020). Perceived organizational support: Why caring about employees counts. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917

Ejemot-Nwadiaro, R. I., Nwachuku, N. S., Obiekezie, E. O., Mwankon, J. P., Nji, E. L.-B., Enyievi, P. B., & Ugwu, O. P.-C. (2026). Workplace stress: Prevalence, sources, and consequences among academic staff at the University of Calabar, Nigeria. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, 1872922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1872922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1872922

Eseadi, C., Onyishi, C. N., & Ossai, O. (2022). Influence of occupational stress on work engagement among Nigerian library personnel. An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 7(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v7i2.2846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v7i2.2846

Galanakis, M. D., & Tsitouri, E. (2022). Positive psychology in the working environment: Job demands-resources theory, work engagement and burnout: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1022102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022102

Gunasekara, K. A., & Perera, B. A. K. S. (2023). Defining occupational stress: A systematic literature review. FARU Journal, 10(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.4038/faruj.v10i1.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/faruj.v10i1.194

Harunavamwe, M., & Kanengoni, H. (2023). Hybrid and virtual work settings; the interaction between technostress, perceived organisational support, work-family conflict and the impact on work engagement. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 14(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-07-2022-0306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-07-2022-0306

Ibini, O., Nwaizugbe, S., Ajisebiolowo, S., & Uye, E. (2025). Examining work group functioning and occupational stress on turnover intention among academic and non-academic staff in Nigeria. TRILOGI: Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi, Kesehatan, dan Humaniora, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.33650/trilogi.v6i3.12410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/trilogi.v6i3.12410

Ibrahim, A. S., & Lawal, A. I. (2026). Occupational stress factors and employee engagement among non-academic staff of universities in Katsina State. Azman University International Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(1), 101–113. https://mssjournals.azmanuniversity.edu.ng/vol1/issue1/article-011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.67523/auijmss.v1i1.011

Inam, A., Ho, J. A., Zafar, H., Khan, U., Ahmed Sheikh, A., & Najam, U. (2021). Fostering creativity and work engagement through perceived organizational support: The interactive role of stressors. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211046937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211046937

Jiang, Q., Lee, H., & Xu, D. (2020). Challenge stressors, work engagement, and affective commitment among Chinese public servants. Public Personnel Management, 49(4), 548–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020912525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020912525

Joshua, G. B., Tsuma, E., Egessa, R., & Onyango, R. (2024). Moderating role of perceived organizational support on the effect of occupational stress management practices on employee engagement amongst law enforcement officers in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.2.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.2.16

Junça Silva, A., & Lopes, C. (2023). Cognitive and affective predictors of occupational stress and job performance: The role of perceived organizational support and work engagement. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(4), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2021-0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2021-0020

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lukan, J., Bolliger, L., Pauwels, N. S., Luštrek, M., De Bacquer, D., & Clays, E. (2022). Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 22, 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8

Maier, C., Thatcher, J. B., Grover, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Cross-sectional research: A critical perspective, use cases, and recommendations for IS research. International Journal of Information Management, 70, 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625

Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988

Ojji, O. I., & Ojia, P. O. (2025). Influence of work stress on the productivity of faculties in Nigeria federal university: A descriptive approach. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 38(6), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2025/v38i61437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2025/v38i61437

Rani, P. B. (2024). Workplace stress and coping strategies: A systematic review. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies, 6(6), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.38193/IJRCMS.2024.6621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38193/IJRCMS.2024.6621

Salamon, J., Tóth-Király, I., Bõthe, B., Nagy, T., & Orosz, G. (2021). Having the cake and eating it too: First-order, second-order and bifactor representations of work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 615581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581

Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556

Shelley, A., & Horner, K. (2021). Questionnaire surveys—Sources of error and implications for design, reporting and appraisal. British Dental Journal, 230, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2654-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2654-3

Shi, X., & Gordon, S. E. (2020). Organizational support versus supervisor support: The impact on hospitality managers’ psychological contract and work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102374

Shi, X., Gordon, S., & Adler, H. (2022). Challenging or hindering? Understanding the daily effects of work stressors on hotel employees’ work engagement and job satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 103, 103211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103211

Singh, S., & Sagar, R. (2021). A critical look at online survey or questionnaire-based research studies during COVID-19. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 65, 102850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102850

Wang, Y. (2024). Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers’ psychological wellbeing: A structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1345740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1345740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1345740

Yang, S., Huang, H., Qiu, T., Tian, F., Gu, Z., Gao, X., & Wu, H. (2020). Psychological capital mediates the association between perceived organizational support and work engagement among Chinese doctors. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00149

Ye, Y., Jiang, Y., & Wang, M. (2026). How stress predicts work engagement among primary and secondary school teachers: The mediating role of emotional labor and burnout, and the moderating role of school support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 171, 105344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105344

Zhang, P., Li, Y., Li, S., Li, L., Chang, S., Fang, Z., Liang, F., & Zhang, H. (2024). Linkage between role stress and work engagement among specialty nurses: A cross-sectional study of China. BMJ Open, 14(8), e079979. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079979

Zhou, M., Lin, Z., Xu, J., Wang, Q., Bian, W., Li, F., et al. (2025). The impact of hindrance-challenge stress on nurses’ work engagement: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 24, 1122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03676-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03676-8

Zimba, O., & Gasparyan, A. Y. (2023). Designing, conducting, and reporting survey studies: A primer for researchers. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(48), e403. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e403

Published

2026-10-21

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A. S., Abdulhakeem, Y., & Isiyaku, N. (2026). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCCUPATIONAL STRESS FACTORS AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AMONG NON-ACADEMIC STAFF OF UNIVERSITIES IN KATSINA STATE: MODERATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT. FUDMA Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 370-387. https://doi.org/10.70882/fjbm.2026.v4i2.143

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A. S., Abdulhakeem, Y., & Isiyaku, N. (2026). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCCUPATIONAL STRESS FACTORS AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AMONG NON-ACADEMIC STAFF OF UNIVERSITIES IN KATSINA STATE: MODERATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT. FUDMA Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 370-387. https://doi.org/10.70882/fjbm.2026.v4i2.143

Most read articles by the same author(s)